Cookie Consent

By clicking “Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.

Cookie preferences
Case Study

How Tenant Experience and Smart Building Technology Affect Rents, Retention and Service Charge Performance

The way the tenant experience in a building is managed matters more than many landlords realise.
Use Case

‍

The way the tenant experience in a building is managed, and how smart technology supports it, matters more than many landlords realise.

In commercial real estate (CRE), tenant experience is increasingly becoming a financial issue and landlords who underestimate it expose themselves to avoidable losses.

Location, lease terms and building specifications are no longer the only factors that matter for a tenant.

Corporate occupiers are evaluating buildings based on the day-to-day experience they provide employees. They expect workplaces that function reliably, support productivity and make it easy to get assistance when something goes wrong. A growing share of that expectation is now shaped by smart building technology:  IoT sensors, connected access control, automated climate systems and smart building platforms that are fast becoming standard in new and retrofitted stock. The global smart building market is projected to grow at roughly a 9% compound annual rate to pass $200 billion by 2032, according to Markets and Markets, a sign of how quickly "smart" is moving from differentiator to baseline expectation.

When buildings fail to deliver that experience, whether through poor service or simply feeling behind the times, the impact extends well beyond property management. It can affect lease renewals, service charge perceptions and ultimately rental performance.

Tenant Expectations Have Changed

Corporate tenants operate in a world where almost every service is available instantly. Employees can order lunch, book transport, reserve meeting rooms and access support through simple digital experiences. Increasingly, they expect the same of their workplace: smart access instead of physical passes, app-based room booking, climate control that responds to real occupancy, and a simple way to flag a problem the moment something isn't working.

Yet reporting an issue in a commercial building often still involves:

  • Contacting reception
  • Sending emails
  • Calling a helpdesk
  • Finding the property manager
  • Following up repeatedly

While these processes may seem minor, they contribute significantly to tenant perception. From a tenant's perspective, how "smart" and responsive a building feels is part of their workplace experience. When issues are difficult to report or slow to resolve, frustration is directed at both the property management team and the landlord, no matter how much technology sits behind the scenes.

CBRE's 2026 Americas Office Occupier Sentiment Survey found that nearly half of organisations (47%) now rate their current workplace experience as insufficient, and a lack of amenities was cited by 53% of occupiers as a top factor limiting office attendance. A building can be full of connected sensors and still fail that test if tenants can't easily get help when something goes wrong.

‍

The Real Cost of Poor Issue Reporting

Imagine a corporate occupier who over a year they experience countless operational issues: temperature complaints, cleaning concerns, access control problems, lift disruptions, etc.  

If reporting is difficult, many of these issues remain unresolved or are repeatedly raised through informal channels. The occupier's perception becomes:

"We keep reporting the same issues."

Even when property management teams and building systems are working hard behind the scenes, poor visibility creates the impression of poor service. That perception becomes a major commercial risk during lease events.  

Let’s review what a non-renewal actually costs:  

In the US, leasing commissions typically run 4–8% of total lease value, tenant improvement/incentive allowances for Class A space averaged $25–90/sqft in 2026, and full-floor downtime between leases is commonly modelled at 6–12 months.  
In the UK, a full‑floor non‑renewal typically carries leasing commissions of 3–6% of total lease value, tenant‑improvement/incentive allowances for Class A space averaged £20–£80/sqft (higher in central London), and full‑floor downtime commonly modelled at 4–10 months.  
These inputs imply one‑time costs of roughly 1.1 to 3.2 years of lost rent.

Every month of that vacancy also erodes net operating income, which compounds further when the asset is valued at the property's cap rate. A single non-renewal is a very expensive way to leave a service issue unresolved.

Is Smart Building Technology the Answer?

Much of the recent investment in commercial real estate has gone into smart infrastructure: BMS, IoT sensors, digital twins and AI-driven analytics that track energy use, occupancy and equipment health in real time. This technology delivers real value. JLL's research on corporate real estate trends found that 59% of occupiers reported meaningful cost savings after retrofit projects, with 55% reporting stronger asset values and 43% citing improved employee productivity as further benefits.

But sensors and BMS platforms only capture what they're built to measure. They can flag an inefficient chiller or an under-occupied floor. They generally can't tell you that a meeting room screen won't connect, that a carpet tile has lifted, or that employees on one floor find the air uncomfortably cold even though the A/C is working at set parameters. That gap between what the building reports and what the people inside it experience is exactly where tenant issue reporting completes the picture. A smart building strategy that only listens to sensors is only half listening.

The human data layer is the missing link.

Service Charge Scrutiny Is Increasing

Corporate occupiers are paying closer attention to service charge costs than ever before because operational costs keep climbing.  JLL estimates electricity alone can account for as much as a quarter of a building's total operating costs. Tenants increasingly are asking:

  • What value are we receiving
  • Why are costs increasing
  • Which services, and which technology investments, are actually improving things
  • How are building operations being managed

Landlords and managing agents are under pressure to demonstrate service quality alongside cost, including the return on proptech spend. Without accurate operational data, these conversations stay subjective. Tenants remember frustrations. Property teams remember effort. Neither side has objective evidence.

Data That Changes the Conversation

When every tenant issue is captured and tracked, and combined with the data from building sensors and BMS platforms, property managers get a genuinely complete picture:

  • Response times
  • Resolution times
  • Recurring issues
  • Service trends
  • Building hotspots
  • Occupant feedback
  • Energy and equipment performance from connected systems

Instead of discussing isolated complaints, landlords can discuss measurable service delivery, backed by both human-reported and sensor-generated evidence. This shifts conversations from:

"We don't think things are improving."

to

"Here's what was reported, how quickly it was resolved, what our building systems show, and where we're investing to improve performance."

‍

‍

Transparency builds trust. Trust improves relationships. And strong relationships support retention.

Retention Is Often Won Between Lease Events

Many landlords focus heavily on lease negotiations but the reality is that renewal decisions begin years before a break option or lease expiry. Occupiers form opinions continuously through everyday interactions with the building.

How responsive is management? How quickly are problems resolved? How easy is it to get support? How visible is progress? Does the building feel like it's kept pace with modern, connected workplaces?

These seemingly small experiences shape whether a tenant views the building as a partner in supporting their business. Research from MIT's Center for Real Estate shows that a one‑point increase in tenant satisfaction (on a five‑point scale) is associated with an 8.6% rise in renewal likelihood, a significant shift relative to the national average renewal rate of around 60%. This demonstrates that tenant experience improvements have measurable financial impact through reduced churn and greater lease stability.

The buildings that consistently deliver positive experiences through smart infrastructure and responsive service working together, are often in a stronger position when renewal conversations begin.

Better Visibility Leads to Better Service Charge Decisions

Issue reporting data doesn't simply improve service delivery. Combined with smart building data, it improves asset management. Over time, landlords can identify:

  • Buildings generating unusually high request volumes
  • Recurring issues requiring capital investment
  • Areas of operational inefficiency
  • Assets driving maintenance costs
  • Where smart building investment will have the most impact

This allows service charge budgets to be allocated more effectively and backed by real operational evidence. Rather than reacting to complaints, property managers can proactively address root causes and make a stronger case that expenditure on smart technology or predictive maintenance is actually producing results.

From Property Management to Tenant Experience Management

The role of commercial property management is evolving. Success is no longer measured solely by occupancy levels or operational compliance. Increasingly, it's measured by the quality of the tenant experience and how well smart building technology and human-centred services work together to deliver it. The tenant experience platform market reflects this shift: Future Market Insights (FMI) analysis values it at $2.8 billion in 2025, projecting growth to $10.3 billion by 2034.

Corporate occupiers want workplaces that help attract staff, support productivity and provide reliable service. For landlords, creating that environment takes more than responsive property management or a building full of sensors. It takes visibility into what tenants and their employees are actually experiencing every day, the layer that connects smart infrastructure to real occupant sentiment.

How Hereworks Solve Helps

Hereworks Solve adds the critical human‑experience layer that most smart building strategies lack. While BMS platforms, IoT sensors and analytics reveal what the building is doing, they cannot reveal what tenants are actually experiencing. Solve closes that gap by making issue reporting instant, visible and measurable across the entire building.

Solve enables any building occupant (tenant, visitor, 3rd party) to report an issue in seconds with no app, no login, no training required. A simple tap or scan captures the problem immediately and routes it to the right team. This removes one of the biggest friction points in commercial buildings: the difficulty of telling someone that something isn’t working. When reporting becomes effortless, the volume and accuracy of human‑experience data increases dramatically.

Every request is automatically logged, categorised and tracked, creating a clear operational record that complements existing smart‑building systems. Property teams gain real‑time visibility into what tenants are experiencing, not just what sensors detect. Heatmaps highlight hotspots across floors and tenant spaces, recurring issues become obvious, and response times can be measured and improved. Instead of relying on anecdotal complaints, property managers can see precisely where service delivery is strong and where it needs attention.

This visibility transforms how buildings are managed. Solve’s mobile‑first workflows reduce bottlenecks and accelerate resolution, ensuring issues are addressed before they influence tenant satisfaction or renewal sentiment.  

For landlords and property managers, Solve delivers clear outcomes:

  • Greater operational visibility alongside existing smart building and BMS data
  • Faster issue resolution
  • Flag recurring maintenance issues
  • Tackle service delivery bottlenecks
  • Emerging trends
  • Measurable service performance
  • Improved tenant engagement
  • Stronger evidence to support service charge and technology investment discussions

Over time, the data reveals patterns that inform capital planning, maintenance strategies and service charge decisions. Property managers can demonstrate how operational performance is improving and where investment is producing measurable results.

By integrating Solve’s human‑reported data with existing smart‑building infrastructure, property managers and landlords gain a complete operational picture that strengthens tenant relationships, supports retention and protects net operating income. Solve makes every occupant feel heard, every issue visible and every improvement measurable.  

In an experience‑driven CRE market, that clarity is essential because tenant experience isn't just an operational metric. It is an asset performance metric.

‍

Download Case Study

Related Case Studies

Use Case

How Tenant Experience and Smart Building Technology Affect Rents, Retention and Service Charge Performance

The way the tenant experience in a building is managed matters more than many landlords realise.

Learn more
Use Case

The Hidden Cost of "Can You Just…" Requests

How informal workplace requests create invisible work for facilities teams and hide the data needed

Learn more
Case Study

When 35% of Issues Keep Hiding in Plain Sight

How a global financial services firm transformed workplace management and discovered problems.

Learn more
Use Case

How Tenant Experience and Smart Building Technology Affect Rents, Retention and Service Charge Performance

The way the tenant experience in a building is managed matters more than many landlords realise.

Learn more
Use Case

The Hidden Cost of "Can You Just…" Requests

How informal workplace requests create invisible work for facilities teams and hide the data needed

Learn more
Case Study

When 35% of Issues Keep Hiding in Plain Sight

How a global financial services firm transformed workplace management and discovered problems.

Learn more
learn more